BB FANS

How different she is when she takes her glasses off? There's a transformation! It was my Dad who alerted me and I think he's right. (I mean action, not looks)

Of all the housemates Vanessa is the one that I am clearly prejudiced about, and I say that openly. Her connections to last years seal, who I detest with almost as much venom as BB1's Nick Basement (yes its a deliberate pun), has unfairly condemned her in my eyes.

She ain't gonna win and will probably be the first to settle back into obscurity.

She is actually a really attractive girl and her skin is particularly healthy and lithe.
I keep waiting for her gameplan to kick in as she becomes the life and soul of the party.
Although as Russell Brand said "This week Vanessa decided to reveal she had a personality and it was unfortunately yuk."

Well he should know all about revealing a yuk personality I suppose!

Can you decipher how you'd have felt about her, had she not had a connection to Marco, Merx?

probably as an inoffensive non-entity.

There are certain people that rile me and i can be very unforgiving. Bateman espoused hatred and intolerance. In some ways his views make him the personification of all the traits that I dislike in certain members of society. It interesting when you see interviews with other BB1 HM's it seems he has not changed.
To a slightly lesser extent Marco was too, he wanted tolerance to be how he wanted to be without offering that same tolerance to others around him. He was probably the most violent in nature than the others and was the catalyst for fight night.

Funny how the things we associate with people put a slant on them. That's true of every walk of life I suppose, not just Big Brother housemates.

Does that count as prejudice, or just preference?

When does preference become prejudice?

Cameron, I don't think that we can ever differentiate preference and perjudice. Liguistically and semantically, yes.. it's possible. But when it comes to reality: how do we measure that? Different people see things differently, don't they?

I was slagged here for supposedly showing too much 'hatred' towards certain housemates. Thus, I was deemed as very over the top! These posters (who slag me) would claim that we can only 'dislike' people, but not to 'hate'. That makes me laugh. The same question pops into my mind. How do we define hatred and dislikeness? Hmmm

There's no place for an idealist in this world. This world (we're currently living) is a place for a realist! I think it's perfectly ok to like, to prejudice, to have preference, to dislike, to love, to hate, etc: as long as we keep it within the context (cyber discussion). My 5 cents.

If I may add my 5 cents-I can think of nothing worse than spouting forth with the supposed "protection"of internet account anonymity in a way that you wouldn't in real life.
Is that not extreme cowardice?

All 'anonymous' posters are guilty of that to some extent, aren't they?

You and a few others have the courage to post as yourself-as you are a famous person.

You've the right to speculate. And if you believe in your own narrow-minded speculation: then, half of UK population must be vile and an extremist. Go and see what people have to say all over the net!

Extreme cowardice? If you think so, then it is. This world is what you think. Reality is a matter of perception. And if you choose to percieve it that way, then that's what your world is (cyberworld = realworld).

Fortunately (and, I'm glad to announce) that I don't take it that way. Horaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy...

You mean this isn't real life?

it is real life-my point exactly.

20 years ago what would be your equivalent "unreal"world ?or has your "unreal " world just appeared out of thin air because ISP's/Boards allow anonymity?
(just interested-not looking to start an arguement)