I don't know if there is any such thing as a great book critic HC. I think anyone who reads books is a critic and all opinions are valid.
I guess I have been reading a lot less than normal these days and I really don't want to waste my time reading something which I think is a bit rubbish. (though I admit it's better than anything I could write

) I think this subject has been done so many times and she didn't really add anything new to it. Also it is hard to read a book and enjoy it when you really couldn't care less about any of the characters, and when they seemed more like sterotypical cariactures, which was the case for me with this one.
I don't mind books being similar, most detective fiction, like P.D James is formulaic and I can still enjoy them. The same with Anne Tyler and various other authors. I think for me, this book was too full of cheesy descriptions and over the top metaphors and it didn't flow. Phrases kept jumping out at me, that had a similar reaction to someone scraping their nails down a blackboard.
I'll take your word on the first book, but won't be reading it anytime soon.
