BB FANS

UK Big Brother Forums






Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 29 May 09, 9:50 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
MPs' £1m payoff (and another £12.5m for pensions)
As the expenses scandal claims three more casualties, we reveal the golden goodbyes that the 12 MPs giving up their seats will receive from the taxpayer


By Nigel Morris, Deputy Political Pditor
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 29 May 09, 14:38 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Glamorous Tory A-Lister In MPs' Expenses Row
skynews


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 29 May 09, 14:49 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
MP Cash 'not intending to quit'
BBC


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 29 May 09, 17:18 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Matthew Norman: Only a written constitution will do
In the constitutional context, 'unwritten' is the euphamism for 'non-existent'

Independnet


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 30 May 09, 23:25 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
David Cameron took out maximum taxpayer-funded mortgage - then paid off own £75k loan four months later
Mail


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 31 May 09, 19:42 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Reality TV dried up? Why not head to Westminster?
As the stars queue down Whitehall, the dream of a class of independent MPs is turning into a nightmare celebrigarchy

guardian


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 02 Jun 09, 9:24 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Cameron pays the price of expenses scandal
Independent poll finds huge surge in support for fringe parties


By Andrew Grice, Political Editor
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 02 Jun 09, 16:07 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London

Sky Sources: Home Sec To Leave Cabinet

Skynews


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 03 Jun 09, 8:44 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Steve Richards: This is the most dangerous week in the PM's career
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 04 Jun 09, 7:52 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Campaign to oust Prime Minister gathers pace
Labour rebels launch coup attempt against Brown on eve of crucial elections. Blears becomes focus of opposition after dramatic resignation from Cabinet


By Andrew Grice, Political Editor
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 04 Jun 09, 8:06 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London

Deborah Orr: A collapse that is long overdue
Labour deserves its fate. But the people it was supposed to represent do not


Could Hazel Blears be showing some small sign of comprehension? Resigning from her ludicrous cabinet post of "Communities Secretary", she says she wants to return "to the grassroots" and to "help the Labour Party reconnect with the British people". Is it dawning at last? Does Blears actually grasp that it is not just this Government, not just Gordon Brown, but Labour that is finished, perhaps forever?

It is all too fitting that the long- overdue collapse of this Government has been precipitated by the expenses scandal. Conservatives may have claimed for moat-cleaning and servants quarters. Their leader may have paid off the mortgage on one home, while leaving the taxpayer to pay the mortgage interest on another. But a sense of entitlement and a cavalier attitude to the subsidy of the privileged by the masses is the essence of Conservatism. Labour is supposed to challenge such attitudes, not lustily embrace them.

Blears, of course, was exposed early on as a "flipper". She paid no capital gains tax on flats she had previously designated as "second homes", seemingly oblivious to the notion that if you believe in progressive taxation, then you are glad to pay your share. Labour politicians should have used their position to abolish exemption from tax on unearned income, not to take sneaky advantage of it.

Insisting that she had done nothing wrong, Blears still tried to buy her way out of trouble. She wrote out a cheque for £13,000 and waved it in the faces of the nation. Did she not realise that a person working full-time on Labour's much-vaunted minimum wage earns less than that in a year, and still pays tax and national insurance on it? Did she not understand that people lie awake at night, wracked with worry over how they are going to pay back a loan-shark's grossly inflated £130? She and so many of her colleagues have a great deal of reconnecting to do.

Yet her resignation speech was still full of cant. Blears also claimed: "My politics has always been rooted in the belief that ordinary people are capable of extraordinary things." That's not a belief, it's a fact. And anyway, you don't help "ordinary people" to achieve "extraordinary things" by making it so damned difficult for them even to get on with the ordinary things.

Nevertheless, as an "ordinary" person, under Labour, you were invited to apply for a "tax credit" if you did something as ordinary as start a family, even if your employer was rolling in it. This travesty of a situation was actually admired by Labour's supporters, and held up as a proof of the party's progressive intent. Repulsive.

Now, 30 years on from the dawn of their last "renewal", Labour is preparing to start staggering around the wilderness again. Its politicians deserve their fate, even though so many of them are ultra-keen to avoid it, by securing for themselves a seat in the Lords, of all places. But the people that they were supposed to represent do not.

And those people are even more invisible now than they were three decades ago. They are working under contract or for an agency, detached from the culture, security and profits of the organisations for which they provide essential services, and utterly powerless to do anything but accept what little they are given – or sign on.

The most picturesque – and visually memorable – aspect of Labour's previous collapse was the Winter of Discontent, in which the most modestly paid of public sector workers rebelled against a pay freeze that had been imposed on them by the Government for several high-inflation years.

Billed as an example of how Labour could not control the unions, it was much more complicated than that. Powerful unions did secure large pay rises for their members in the private sector. The strikers of 1978-79 saw none of this largesse and were as furious about that as the most red-blooded proto-Thatcherite. But while the power of the unions was curbed – and needed to be – the powerlessness of the low-paid was never addressed, not by the Conservatives, not by Labour.

The nearest Labour ever came to arguing that having a large chunk of poverty-stricken and disenfranchised people milling round society was corrosive and destabilising was the introduction of its patronisingly paternalistic – and failed – plan to "lift" millions of children out of poverty. The rhetoric was that "hard-working families" would be supported by "making work pay". Yet beyond the pitiful minimum wage there was little or no attempt to "make work pay", except the "temporary" 10p tax band.

Poverty was merely subsidised by Labour, through the machinations of an inefficient state that knew that our burgeoning social problems – educational failure, parental abuse, violent criminality – were hugely exacerbated by lack of personal prosperity, but were too gutless to make a moral case for genuine fair pay and therefore a measure of independence from Labour's ghastly, intrusive, self- serving bureaucratic schemes.

And poverty was subsidised so badly too. There was negligible investment in an expanded housing infrastructure that would make it easier to live modestly and well, or in public transport infrastructure that would make it possible to travel and work cheaply and efficiently. Those things are more desperately needed now than ever, but the great, stupid, spending spree is over.

I don't actually understand why anyone would wish to step forward and run the country now, it is so totally screwed up. I can't understand why the left keeps arguing for huge public spending projects when there so clearly is no more money. I can't understand why economists seem to believe that rising house prices are a sign of "recovery", when actually they are a sign that the economy is not "rebalancing".

I can't understand where Brown finds the resolve every morning to get out of bed and face the day. I can't understand why there is so little realisation of how tragic and divisive the last 30 years have been, and what desperately few options are left to us. It's not just the Government that's in meltdown. It's the whole bloody shebang, and it will take another 30 years or so to fix it. Well done, Labour.
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 04 Jun 09, 8:08 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Matthew Norman: We are witnessing a very British form of anarchy
There is only blind panic and frantic plotting by members of a headless party



Come on now, admit it, this is the most tremendous fun ever. EVER. After weeks of holding forth about systemic crisis, loss of public trust, constitutional reform and all the rest of it, the moment comes to stop "bloviating", to use the Washington verb for pompous punditry, and confess that we are in heaven.

That apart, I haven't a clue what exactly is going on in Bedlam-by-the-Thames, let alone whether this Labour PM, like Harold Wilson before him, is going on. Nobody does, not even those brethren who have looked down from the press gallery for decades, because there is no template for mayhem like this. We have been beamed aboard a planet that has never even been probed.

Into the vacuum where the guiding light of precedent ordinarily lives, the clichés rush as feverishly as the analogies, but offer zero insight. "Chaos theory" sounds cool, but only about four people in the world understand what that really means, and I'm not one of them. With references to No 10 suffering catastrophic engine failure or going into a corkscrew spin verging on the tasteless, rats departing the sinking ship is the transport metaphor du jour.

Rats are smart and terrifying little vermin, however, while the only fear you'd feel on finding yourself in Room 101 separated by a flimsy wire mesh from Hazel Blears' gob is that she'd use it not to gore or gnaw, but to bore you to death with her cretinous "sunny optimism". The self-righteousness in yesterday's crude assassination attempt (technically, letter of resignation) suggested an excommunication order issued against his useless, dithery bishop by a cleric about to be unfrocked for choirboy interference.

Even a large cheque made out to HM Inland Revenue couldn't buy you sport like this, and the memory of Rafael Nadal's unimaginable defeat in Paris counsels against cocky predictions. However apparently overpowering the scent of Gordon Brown's terminal gangrene, all one can safely do is unleash a barrage of ifs and then qualify them. If Blears' departure is part of a coordinated effort with fellow pre-emptive resigners to destabilise him fatally, it might work and it might not.

Writing yesterday afternoon, with events moving like a runaway train and my psychic powers oddly diminished, I have not the foggiest whether any further cabinet ministers jumped overnight, or plan to do so between now and the imminent reshuffle that promises much for fans of the surreal. If so, that might be the tipping point. And it might not.

If late tonight Labour has lost control of the four of its metropolitan councils up for grabs, which is likely, that could do it. Or not. A share of the popular vote in local elections below 20 per cent would seem the final straw, but the ability of this prime ministerial camel to keep plodding on through the dunes with nothing in the tank is just about the only known known, as Donald Rumsfeld would have it, that survives.

If tomorrow, or on Monday, Gordon makes Ed Balls his Chancellor, we are assured that so factional an appointment of so divisive a figure could provoke the tidal wave of internecine bitterness to sweep him away. But again, it might do no such thing.

And if on Sunday it emerges that Labour was bested in the Euro election popular vote by Ukip, you'd think that even Gordon would feel compelled to consider retiring with the Scotch and trusty Luger. But thinking in the absence of any map for these unchartered waters is futile. If gut instinct is any guide, my own hunch is that at this moment, with the Labour backbenchers' Go Now Gordon petition reportedly gathering signatures by the hour, it is marginally odds-on that he'll be gone this time next week; and that by tomorrow morning his survival will have drifted further. But my hunch is at best as good as yours, and probably worse.

Logically, of course, there shouldn't be a chance in a thousand that a PM who has lost every ounce of authority over his Cabinet, his government and the House of Commons, every last milligram of respect from the country, and any remote ability to shape events could blunder on for another day, let alone another year. But logic galloped out of town long ago, leaving in its wake this captivating production of One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest as reworked by Alan Ayckbourn, with additional material from Dario Fo and stage directions by Ray Cooney.

Onto even the most joyous of vistas the odd drop of sadness must fall, the one here being that no one will be loving Gordon's torment more than Cherie Blair – the half woman-half supermarket trolley mythological hybrid whose fill-your-boots avarice did so much to create the culture of greed that has all but destroyed him. The lone shard of poignancy flying forth from his shattered administration, meanwhile, is that the PM is so uniquely ill-suited to take what comfort the vaguely normal would extract by way of gallows humour.

Dame Edna famously commended Jeffrey Archer for being able to laugh at himself, adding that but for this "you'd be missing the joke of the century". The PM, bless him, is missing the political joke of the millennium.

The days when pretentious gits like me invoked tragedy in a Gordonian context have long since passed. Tragic heroism relies upon a certain largeness of spirit, or at the very least a sudden moment of self-knowledge so acute that it induces intolerable psychic anguish. Ajax slaughtered his sheep when made aware of his fatal flaw, Oedipus put out his eyes when faced with his. Despite his ocular head start in that direction, Gordon is as nugatory a figure as Nero, fiddling with ritualistic lines at yesterday's PMQs while his government self-immolates.

It's the smallness of the man, the lack of grandeur in his dreams, the pathetic dressing-up of rank self-interest in the translucent cloak of dutifulness, that makes guilt-free schaudenfraude less a temptation than a moral obligation. For this has become a morality play – specifically, the first morality high farce in politico-theatrical history - about a system so deranged in its complacency that it gifts such power to one whose personal ambition is surpassed only by his lack of talent, without any mechanism to remove him once that power has drained away.

What we are witnessing is a very British form of anarchy. There are no rules here, only blind panic and frantic plotting by members of a headless party with enough nerve endings still active to charge around until electoral rigor mortis sets in.

As for the rest of us, like superannuated Bisto Kids, we stand with our noses pressed up against the window onto the best little madhouse in town, reveling in the sight of the inmates desecrating the asylum they won't be running for much longer. The process of rebuilding the political system will be lengthy, dull and doubtless horribly botched. So for now let's enjoy the electric, convulsive merriment, if only for the therapy, and leave the bloviating for more sombre days ahead.
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 09 Jun 09, 16:17 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Gordon Brown's brother wins libel damages from Scotland on Sunday
Andrew Brown takes libel damages at high court over false claim about payments from his brother

guardian


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 09 Jun 09, 16:21 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Expense row MP cleared for new ministerial role
Metro


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: MPs' expenses - Speaker resigns
PostPosted: 12 Jun 09, 16:10 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
'Stupid, thoughtless and cruel': Tearful Hazel Blears reveals her regrets at knifing Brown
By NICOLA BODEN
Mail


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Material breaching copyright laws should be reported to webmaster (-at-) bbfans.com. BBFans.com is in no way affilated with Channel4 or Endemol.