BB FANS

UK Big Brother Forums






Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Highlights Sunday 20th July
PostPosted: 22 Jul 08, 11:01 
Offline
Big Brother
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 28 Dec 02, 2:16
Posts: 3349
Location: England
Christine wrote:
John, they didn't take the bananas to ensure they were in Hell. Mo said , 'I feel like eating those bananas and I know that whoever wins this, I will be in Hell anyway, so damn it, I am going to eat them. Kat said, 'Yes, I think I will also definitely be in Hell, so I will have some as well.' It was greed talking, not the opposite as you seem to be suggesting. Kat and Mo were both in Heaven all week with loads of food, so if anyone should have takenthe bananas, it should have been the Hell housemates, not them.



I watched this, and what led up to it on L/F.

Most of the hms were in the garden watching May and Dale on the tyres. They'd all been talking about the bananas - like, who was allowed to eat them (only May and Dale as we know) when in a light-hearted/naughty way Mo 'I feel like eating those bananas'.
Stu,Rex and some others thought this was a such a laugh they actively encouraged Mo and Kat to go ahead - btw, they also tried to get Rachel to do it too, but as we know, Rachel is an individual who decides for herself what she will or won't do.

My point is, Mo and Kat did it to give the bored hms sitting around the garden a laugh (and get some air-time no doubt) AND because they knew they were going to hell side anyway, not out of greed.

On the subject of greed, when Jen was in the house Dale and her used to stay up till all hours and Dale was forever cooking fry-ups in secret for himself while the rest of the hms were sleeping.
Stu cooked a pizza for himself, Dale and Rex in secret the other night (they thought it was a scream!) Kat walked in on them but she just laughed about it.

I'm no fan of Mo or Kat, but in this instance I think they've been judged unfairly.

_________________
I SCREAM, YOU SCREAM, WE ALL SCREAM FOR MORPHINE


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Highlights Sunday 20th July
PostPosted: 22 Jul 08, 13:19 
Offline
Big Brother
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: 06 Jun 02, 21:16
Posts: 12163
Location: The Junk Shop
John wrote:
The bananas were mere currency in a little power-play between Mohamed and the wider group who were seeking to marginalise him. Kat understood that by also joining in and so did Rachel who wanted so much to support their mini-rebellion but was paralysed by fears for the consequences.


Well said (and well argued) John.

That's how I interpreted it too (but wouldn't have been able to put it so elegantly).


John wrote:
The proof though comes from Rex's goading of Rachel... surely no one is suggesting he was trying to talk Rachel into being hungry? He understood exactly what was happening and was happy to milk Rachel's discomfort.


I don't get Rex's appeal at all. Good-looking? Maybe. Arrogant? Definitely. Is that so attractive? Some women seem to like that, always baffles me. I suppose it's the equivalent of men falling for high maintenance vamps. Once bitten (blood-sucked) you learn better though.

Anyway, I think Rex is a conceited bore. He's spiteful, self-interested, boastful and boring. It's no wonder the only friends he has are as vapid as himself.

As I said in another post, don't go on Big Brother if you're looking for self-validation (post here on BBFans with the rest of us malcontents).

He is a great HM though. I do enjoy frowing my brow and muttering profanities when he's on the screen.

I know I said he's boring, but great HMs can also be boring such as Jon Tickle, Eugene and (to others) Cameron.


John wrote:
Later, Luke and Bex both, possibly Stuart too were supporting Darnell when he also decided to take a banana, again to score a point not because he'd suddenly fancied a nibble.


I thought they were just glad to see someone get themselves into trouble with teacher. It's real playground stuff in there (always is). "No, YOU put a landmine on teacher's chair! Go on!"

They were delighted that Mo and Kat ate of the forbidden fruit. "Hey, Big Brother will have to kick them out! We might not even have an eviction next week! Hooray! I'm safe!!"


John wrote:
The golden rule in Big Brother is that whenever food is mentioned, its almost never about hunger and always about politics. That's why BB themselves have always made the supply of food into the house such a principle feature of the show.


Agreed, it's a much better strategy to create conflict than sleep deprivation. You don't want tired HMs sitting around miserably grumbling, you want them active and grumbling. Wait, they do just sit around grumbling...

_________________
Image Big Bother


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Highlights Sunday 20th July
PostPosted: 22 Jul 08, 16:06 
Offline
Big Brother
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: 16 Apr 02, 22:31
Posts: 4353
Location: Lancashire & Malaysia
Thanks Geena and Alan.... ()^

Geena:
Excellent observation about Dale's late night snacking. I saw this too and night after night without fail, he'd be filling himself up on calories. He's repeatedly complained (and still does) that he's not bulky enough. But its strange how the HMs ignore this (some even joining in on his snacking) and yet take great delight in levelling the accusation at Mohamed!

Alan:
Pleased to see someone else notice the "Hey Teacher?" thing. I'm gob smacked at how many times I've witnessed a stark contrast between HMs and how they deal with events in the House. Darnell will often play things down with a "Its cool Dude, don't worry about it". Mohamed will shrug his shoulders or later apologise. However Dale immediately seeks out the nearest camera and starts bleating that 'BB should do something'. Luke will do the same but with an appeal of "What will the public think...?".

As you said, all playground stuff... interesting viewing to be sure but its not winning them any respect or making them worthy winners.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Highlights Sunday 20th July
PostPosted: 22 Jul 08, 19:41 
Offline
Big Brother
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: 06 Jun 02, 21:16
Posts: 12163
Location: The Junk Shop
John wrote:
As you said, all playground stuff... interesting viewing to be sure but its not winning them any respect or making them worthy winners.


But are most of the viewers more 'like' the Heaven group, or are they more 'like' the current Hell group? That's not to say voters vote for people who are like themselves, although I suspect they do.

A thought just occured to me (I'll be having a lie down in a moment), does anyone think that with dwindling viewing figures, whether the demographic of the viewers has shifted significantly?

Is it now only hardcore BB nutters who vote? (as they are the only ones watching, casual viewers have drifted away) Is the audience now just the older, wiser viewers. Less likely to say "Dale to win! Coz he's fit!"

And are the remaining addicts more likely to vote for different types of people rather than some of the winners we've had in the past?

Would BB1 Craig win now? Would Cameron? etc.

Probably. But just a thought...

(there's still a diversity of opinion about HMs even among the addicts)

_________________
Image Big Bother


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Material breaching copyright laws should be reported to webmaster (-at-) bbfans.com. BBFans.com is in no way affilated with Channel4 or Endemol.