BB FANS

While I've never loathed Stu, and I gave him credit for being a good team member during the cycling task, if he was to win the show - now that would be bizarre. Might as well have Dale back in, to be bridesmaid for Stu's big day!

I'd be happy enough if Rachel, Kat or Mikey won.

I'm not in a position to judge their integrity, but I do think in general that Rachel and Kat have been decent, and honest. Although there is the niggling doubt that Kat's acting out a role - or acting up for the cameras. Still, worse 'crimes' have been committed on BB.

Mikey's been entertaining, and brave in confronting people who annoy him - he certainly does that more than Rachel. But is Rachel being non-confrontational, because of a game plan, or because that's her modus operandi in real life? As Grace Dent said, avoiding becoming engrossed in arguments is quite an acceptable way to live 'in real life'. What would worry me is that Rachel might be more naive than I would like. The fact that she doesn't nominate Rex is unsettling. There's nothing wrong with seeing good in others - even awkward and belligerent others - but I'm surprised she's not considered that the house might be more pleasant for her, without Rex.

It seems to me that Mikey is the one who paradoxically 'has eyes to see' what's really going on in the house.

But they do... and often they are unaware they have done so.

But anyway, I'm holding judgement on Mohamed's nomination of Rachel... I'm sure there's more going on here and as we near the game's end we'll no doubt see more of this sort of thing. Mo' probably wouldn't nominate Rex (or his GF) so his targets are limited. And don't forget, half the house also nominated Rachel so he's hardly been especially devious.

But Rex would him in heartbeat over Nicole, a couple who the he has reinforced by snipping one of his own group.

Yes Rex did nominate Rachel but that would be in line with his open hostility to her, its only taken for Mo to be deprived one nights sleep in heaven and some cake for him to turn on her over Lisa whose held nothing but open hostility for the guy from day one.

Odds & Polls news:

Oddschecker:
Stuart 1/7
Rachel 4/1

DS:
Week 10 - Who do you want to evict?
Stuart 366 75.62%
Rachel 118 24.38%
Voters: 484

Tiscali:
Who should go on Friday?
Stuart - he keeps whinging about leaving - so leave! 65%
Rachel - I don't buy her act - she is so fake! 35%

BBonline:
Who do you want evicted on Friday?
Stuart Pilkington 65%
Rachel Rice 35%

thisisbb:
Rachel vs Stuart - Who do want to be evicted? [Week 10 eviction]
Stuart 65.1%
Rachel 34.9%
Total votes: 43

The Sun:
Stu 58%
Rachel 42%

MSN:
Who do you want evicted from the Big Brother house this week?
Stuart 52%
Rachel 48%
1408 responses

Orange

cheers finchy.

I still wouldnt place a bet on this, its easy and cheap to click on a free poll its anther thing to waste good money on an actual vote, only certain people do and they cant always be relied on to be sane.

True, but BBonline & Tiscali have been quite close to the evction % more often that not, so if they're saying 65%, that's a comfortable margin of error to see the back of Stuart.

I wouldn't put a bet on it either though as with my luck, Rachel would go with 50.05%. Or using the Luke vote counting system, 48.2%

Not getting immersed in arguments may be a reasonable strategy in the real world, where you aren't living with the same people 24/7, but in a house where you can't get away from others, you might need to get involved in the odd discussion or two to clear the air. Rachel is everything Luke said she was, it would seem.

so Stu is for the chop then, like finchy says BBonline & Tiscali are scarily accurate

the house is gonna be very boring for me to watch if it's just filled with Rachel, Kat, Mo, Darnell, Rex or Nicole for the final week

I don't think Stu's been that bad, apart from being a pratt during spitgate

Based solely on the H/Ls show he has just been an obnoxious self involved, body image obsessed patronising bullying cretin however I cant describe how he comes across on the live stream as it involves several words that are not acceptable on a polite forum.

Question - Did BB actualy show Mo`s noms or even mention Mos noms in last nights H/L show?

all noms have been mentioned throughout the series

but (for whatever reason) a fair few HMs weekly noms don't get shown

Odds & Polls news for Wednesday:

Oddschecker:
Stuart 1/16
Rachel 7/1

DS:
Week 10 - Who do you want to evict?
Stuart 994 74.68%
Rachel 337 25.32%
Voters: 1331

thisisbb:
Rachel vs Stuart - Who do want to be evicted? [Week 10 eviction]
Stuart 65.9%
Rachel 34.1%
Total votes: 777

BBonline:
Who do you want evicted on Friday?
Stuart Pilkington 65%
Rachel Rice 35%

Tiscali:
Who should go on Friday?
Stuart - he keeps whinging about leaving - so leave! 59.1%
Rachel - I don't buy her act - she is so fake! 40.9%

The Sun:
Stu 59%
Rachel 41%

Orange:
Who should go on Friday?
Stu - he's missing home - 52% (126 votes)
Rachel - we won't miss her - 48% (118 votes)

MSN:
Who do you want evicted from the Big Brother house this week?
Rachel 51%
Stuart 49%
4328 responses

MSN want to evict Rachel (just) - out of 4328 responses

suart odds on to go according to the bookies

LISA 'NOT SURPRISED' THAT RACHEL IS UP

By Andy Wells for dailystar.co.uk

Lisa said Rachel's selfishness "backfired" on her now she is up for eviction.

The former bodybuilder told Big Brother she was not surprised the trainee teacher is facing the public vote on Friday after her stint as head of house.

She said: "I'm not surprised Rachel is up, because when she was head of house, she was very much about what she wanted and it backfired on her."

The 40-year-old sales rep - who was one part of the first ever couple to enter the Big Brother house together with evictee Mario - also said she felt she would be the one to face the axe.

She said: "I'll be honest, I thought I was going to be up, but everyone thinks that."

Lisa went on to praise hunky housemate Stuart - who also faces eviction this week - for tactically putting himself forward for nominations.

She added: "Stuart's got an interesting angle, in that he wanted to be up against what he feels is a group, which is Rachel, Kathreya, Mohamed and Darnell.

"Because everybody feels that if you're up against them, you've got no chance."
dailystar

And come tomorrow, that theory should be proven correct