BB FANS

UK Big Brother Forums






Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 429 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 29  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 07 Oct 08, 9:21 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Secrets of Iraq's death chamber
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 07 Oct 08, 9:36 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
America's Defence Secretary Robert Gates accuses British officials of 'defeatism'
telegraph


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 20 Oct 08, 22:33 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London

British charity worker shot dead in Kabul




Two Taliban gunmen killed a British woman aid worker in the Afghan capital today, accusing her of spreading Christian propaganda, in an attack that could help further restrict humanitarian activities in Afghanistan.

Taliban insurgents have increasingly targeted aid workers this year in their campaign to spread an atmosphere of fear and undermine claims by the Afghan government and its Western backers that they are bringing security to the war-ravaged nation.

"She was walking to work this morning. There were two people on a motorcycle. They got off the motorcycle and shot her and then went away on the motorcycle. She was dead pretty soon afterwards," said Mark Lyth, the board chairman of SERVE Afghanistan, the aid agency which employed the woman.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack. "We killed her for spreading Christian propaganda," Zabiullah Mujahid, a spokesman for the militant group, told Reuters by telephone.

SERVE Afghanistan is a British-based Christian aid organisation focusing on community development and education and training for people with disabilities.

Though NATO insists increased Taliban attacks this year bely its success in weakening the Islamist rebels, targeted Taliban assassinations, suicide and roadside bombs have increased the sense of personal insecurity among Afghans and foreigners alike.

A suicide bomber hit a convoy of German troops in the relatively peaceful north of Afghanistan on Monday, killing five children and two German soldiers, a senior police official said.

Keeping Berlin's 3,300 troops in Afghanistan is already unpopular in Germany and the deaths will likely only increase calls for them to be withdrawn and put further strain on the alliance, which is struggling to contain the Taliban insurgency.

Thirty German soldiers have now died in Afghanistan.

The relentless violence has led Washington to commission a strategic review of its military campaign, which suffers from a plethora of different rules of engagement and restrictions on operations among the 41 nations with troops in Afghanistan.

NATO members are now wavering in their political commitment to Afghanistan, a top alliance commander said, describing the seven-year campaign against the Taliban as disjointed.

"We are demonstrating a political will that is in my judgment sometimes wavering," U.S. General John Craddock, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe, said in a speech to policymakers and defence analysts in London.

"It's this wavering political will that impedes operational progress and brings into question the relevance of the alliance here in the 21st century," he said.

Dissatisfaction with the presence of foreign troops and widespread government corruption, coupled with Taliban intimidation, has led to an extension of insurgent influence closer to Kabul and to the hitherto largely peaceful north.

There were more than 120 attacks on aid programmes in the first seven months of this year, the United Nations says, killing 30 aid workers. Afghanistan is one of the very poorest countries in the world, with an average life expectancy of just 44 years.

"As the conflict has spread to previously peaceful areas, more aid workers have been caught up in the conflict," said a senior aid worker in Kabul.

"This is not going to lead to aid agencies withdrawing from Afghanistan. What happens is that aid agencies find ways of dealing with insecure environments," he said. "Agencies may adopt a lower profile."

Three female aid workers and their Afghan driver were killed in an ambush outside Kabul in August, the bloodiest single attack on foreign humanitarian workers in Afghanistan in recent years.

In the southern ethnic Pashtun heartlands, the dozens of Taliban casualties inflicted almost daily by Afghan and NATO troops have done little to diminish the insurgency.

Afghan and NATO-led troops killed 34 Taliban insurgents in two days of fighting near the capital of the southern province of Helmand, the provincial governor's spokesman said on Monday.

But undermining any success in the operation to fight off the rare attack on the provincial capital, NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) admitted it may have killed a number of civilians in an air strike in Helmand on Thursday.

ISAF troops, it said, were ambushed from a compound. With no evidence of civilians in the compound, it said an air strike was called in after sustained fighting. Provincial officials said last week 17 civilians were killed in the attack in the Naad Ali district, but ISAF gave no number.

"The air strike accurately struck the enemy target. It now appears that some civilians may have been killed as a result of that assault. We regret and are deeply saddened by the loss of civilian life," ISAF said
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 15 Nov 08, 21:36 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Robert Fisk's World: There is no end to the centuries of savagery in Afghanistan
Geneva Conventions were supposed to end the mass destruction of human life

Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 14 Dec 08, 12:58 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Report Spotlights Iraq Rebuilding Blunders


By JAMES GLANZ and T. CHRISTIAN MILLER
NYT


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 14 Dec 08, 13:05 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Those who promoted and condoned the twin national catastrophes of reckless war in Iraq and reckless gambling in our markets have largely escaped the accountability that now seems to await the Chicago punk nabbed by the United States attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald.
NYT


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 15 Dec 08, 10:22 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Duck! It's George double-shoe Bush
Sun


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 29 Dec 08, 13:26 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Anti-Spy System Revealed To Sky
Skynews


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 04 Jan 09, 15:00 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
The New York Times has a in-depth look at the corruption in the Afghan government, and it’s a stark reminder of how closely we’re repeating history on many fronts.

As Dexter Filkins explains, almost anything in Afghanistan is for sale:

www.theseminal.com


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 19 Jan 09, 10:17 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London

Bruce Anderson: History will vindicate George Bush

In their abuse, his critics demonstrate their own weak hold on reality



It is not difficult to make the case against George Bush. There have been mistakes. But in their abuse of him, many of his liberal critics demonstrate their own weak hold on reality. In trying to belittle him, they merely reveal their own littleness. George Bush is a much more considerable figure than the caricature version. As he has set great events in motion, it will be impossible to judge his Presidency for many years. It is not impossible that history will offer a partial vindication.

The outgoing President did have one problem, especially in Europe. He may have finished off his father's war against Saddam Hussein. He was not able to avenge his father's defeat at the hands of the English language. Although some of George Bush junior's speeches will rank high in the annals of political oratory, once he was without a text, he often went adrift. But this was not due to lack of ability.

Early on, a friend of mine on the National Security Council went to a Bush Cabinet meeting. He had heard the reports that George Bush was a constitutional monarch with Dick Cheney as his prime minister, so he was interested to see what would happen. He watched as Mr Bush ran proceedings like a strong chief executive, while Mr Cheney did not say a word.

But it all comes back to the Iraq War, which was a tragedy, for a reason worthy of a great tragedian. It was fought in a spirit of excessive idealism. After 11 September, the US Administration asked itself one repeated and agonised question. Why do these people hate us? The Bush team came up with their answer: because they live in failed states, which offer their young no hope in this world and thus leave them open to the temptations of fanaticism and a better deal in another world.

Baghdad was one of the foremost cities in the Muslim world. Iraq was a rich country with a large educated middle class. Yet it had become a police state and many of its ablest people had fled into exile. Moreover, Saddam had been trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction. We could not be certain that his quest had failed. So should we wait until the certainty of a mushroom cloud? It seemed that all the routes to progress in the Middle East and safety in the West led to Iraq.

There was one problem. Largely because of the malign influence of that fraud and tautology, international law, we have grown squeamish about regime change. As a result, the overwhelming desirability of regime change in Iraq had to be downplayed, and there was a further difficulty: the most unfortunate un-meeting of minds in recent public policy. After 2001, in both Washington and London, there was a split between those who knew Iraq, who were generally hostile to the War, and those who wanted war but usually knew nothing about Iraq. George Bush had little confidence in his Secretary of State, Colin Powell. Unable to sack Mr Powell, he made up for it by not listening to the State Department. Tony Blair never took much notice of his foreign secretaries.

As a result, the Arabists' expertise was disregarded and two vital conversations never took place. I will give the London version. Foreign Secretary: "There is no point in continuing this discussion. The PM has decided to go to war alongside the Americans, and that is that". Permanent Secretary: "All right, Foreign Secretary, but in order to give yourself any chance of success, you have got to do the following..." Foreign Secretary: "Now you're talking. I want a paper explaining all that on my desk by close of play tomorrow, and I will stand over the PM till he's read every word."

That never happened. Instead, the direction of events was left to the neo-conservatives, most of whom were dangerous idealists who believed that democracy was an infallible political antibiotic.

In that onrush of naivety, two crazy decisions were taken: to abolish the Iraqi army and to de-Baathise the civil service. In 1945, the allies were content to employ large numbers of former Nazi party members in the new West German bureaucracy. The practical arguments were equally strong in Iraq. There would have been one problem which had not been present in Germany; the army and civil service were Sunni power-centres, and the Shia would have demanded changes. But that could have been manageable. In a sullen and far from idealistic spirit, large parts of Iraq are now sort of working. But that could have happened much earlier had the mistakes not been made. If so, George Bush's ratings would be much higher.

His critics also insist that he should not have used the phrase "war on terror". That tells us a lot about their unwillingness to face up to a dangerous world. George Bush meant that America could not afford to relax until all terrorist organisations with a global reach had been defeated. That is not inflated rhetoric. It is common sense.

There was one unfortunate side effect of the war on terror: Guantanamo. At the time, it seemed a good idea: a cunning means of preventing American lawyers from undermining America's security. But the US prides itself on being a nation founded upon laws. It follows that a legal vacuum is only tolerable for a brief period. It has now dragged on for far too long. That said, anyone who denies that there are some exceedingly dangerous men in Guantanamo should be forced to live among them.

On the economy, and like Gordon Brown, George Bush could be accused of failing to fix the roof while the sun was shining. But two years' ago, it all seemed to be working. Growth was strong. Even after the Bush tax cuts, tax receipts were at record levels. A country with a young population, America did not have Europe's demographic weaknesses: too few earners and too many pensioners. Back in the days when sub-prime mortgage holders were just ordinary Americans trying to climb the ladder, there were grounds for hoping that the US could grow its way out of deficits and back to fiscal prudence. George Bush did not foresee the crisis. Who did?

It now looks as if there will be many more continuities between the Bush Administration and the Obama one than many of the new President's supporters had hoped. That is a tribute to George Bush. It will not be the last.
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 16 Feb 09, 15:53 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London

A 'fraud' bigger than Madoff


Senior US soldiers investigated over missing Iraq reconstruction billions

By Patrick Cockburn in Sulaimaniyah, Northern Iraq.
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 17 Feb 09, 23:08 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London

Alarm over Afghan civilian deaths



The number of civilians killed in the conflict in Afghanistan rose 39% last year, the United Nations says.
BBC


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 19 Feb 09, 11:30 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London

Where are Afghanistan's missing millions?


Clancy Chassay hears charges of corruption levelled against the UN and aid agencies after millions earmarked for a Kabul hospital disappear
guardian


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 28 Feb 09, 9:45 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
Obama announces troop pullout
US combat forces to leave Iraq by summer 2010, but military presence will continue until end of 2011


By Patrick Cockburn
Independent


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Iraq - Afghanistan news
PostPosted: 07 Mar 09, 20:58 
Offline
News Team Member
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 30 Dec 02, 18:50
Posts: 63927
Location: London
How MI5 colluded in my torture: Binyam Mohamed claims British agents fed Moroccan torturers their questions - WORLD EXCLUSIVE
By DAVID ROSE
Mail


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 429 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 29  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Material breaching copyright laws should be reported to webmaster (-at-) bbfans.com. BBFans.com is in no way affilated with Channel4 or Endemol.