BB FANS

HAHAHAHAH.

(Apologies in case you're not joking)

many a true word spoken in jest.....

what would you do if you were back in the house this year then?

So why didn't he pull out...?

FAB!

R O F L

I dunno - I have really liked this series on the whole. There's things about each of them now that I like and I think I would enjoy being there with that lot.

In a funny way (and on each of their individual 'moral' levels) they're ALL right about Siavash's refusal to nominate. Fascinating.

Hello!

I'm 1 hr behind.

Loving Marcus's reactions to Sophie's geography. I don't think he can believe that anyone's that thick.

No worries Mama Chocolat. We'll wait.

Hi CT

I don't want to watch the hour again, but do tell us what you think of Siavash's trousers ..and single eyebrow

Charlie is so two-faced.
Charlie: I feel really bad nominating Marcus, he's my friend, etc etc
BB: Those are not valid reasons for nominating, if you don't nominate properly you and Sophie will be up for...
Charlie (interrupting): Oh no, BB I have plenty of other reasons for nominating Marcus, he swears and he's nasty

But you love him really, CT...

To me it is Sophie and Siavash who are the most worried about being up for nomination. They both tried and failed to get David nominated and now try and justify their tactic with we only wanted three to be up so it would be fairer. Baloney.

Sophie fancies Siavash.

Trousers are great. I think Siavash's style is contrived though-each outfit is a work of art, but I see no continuity, no thumbprint that says Siavash. Just well put together individual outfits. I've never really liked Siavash as a bloke, but I've quite liked the style, the two have never gone together for me. The eyebrow was a result of boredom and I think he's already got plans to salvage the disasterinto some picture for Friday-Sophie's already drawn her missing brow in.

The argument at the end really showed the intellectual divide in the house, and with the exception of Marcus (and weirdly Sophie-sort of...) none of them were prepared to listen or to try and understand Siavash's reasons; all they wanted to do was to interrupt him, to put him down, insult him, accuse him of being obsessed with nominating (pot calling kettle...), or to tell him that he should be grateful for getting on the show because you didn't have such a hard childhood like mine that if BB says jump I jump.... Sadly for Charlie, he's so dim that he hasn't realised that if he wants the public to vote out Siavash this week and Marcus is left in the last week, then Marcus will more than likely win.

Hurrah! Result.

Siavash is a prat, and he <b>is</b> obsessed with noms and going up for eviction and has some bizarre notion of "fairness" that means it would be "unfair" for him to go up against Marcus alone (don't get that myself, and I think it's more to do with him being sh*t-scared to go up against Marcus) BUT, having said all that, WTF was the argument about?

Like Truffle says, it showed the intellectual divide. And the maturity divide too - notice how Marcus and Lisa didn't get that involved in it all. But it's good to see Siavash's stupid plan blew up in his face, all the same

MARCUS FTW!

As Charlie said to Siavash -if you think it fairer we all face nominations, why did you nominate for the first nine weeks"?
He had no answer to that or an answer to Charlie's accusation that he is a liar and a cheat.
It is all tactics with him, he is trying to save his, I would say neck if he had one, so I will say himself.

He tried to suggest in the DR and to the other housemates that they got rid of Freddie and Bea, as if that was against the rules. Nothing about his part in the Bea assassin, or his constant tactic to have Lisa nominated. The man is a prize fool and doesn't deserve to stay in the house over Marcus.